Provider queries are a cornerstone of Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI). They bridge the gap between what clinicians write and what payers recognize, ensuring that the patient story is captured accurately, completely, and compliantly.

But in most organizations, this bridge is collapsing. Research indicates that nearly 60% of provider queries go unanswered, leaving CDI teams frustrated and critical medical documentation gaps unresolved. The fallout is significant: missed revenue, delayed claims, audit risk, and ultimately, patient records that don’t reflect true acuity.

In this article, we examine why so many queries go unanswered and what leading organizations are doing to turn query response into a reliable, high-value process.

‍

Why So Many Provider Queries Go Unanswered

It's easy to blame the issue as simply "physician noncompliance". But the truth is more nuanced. Several systemic factors make unanswered queries a near inevitability in many organizations. They are:

‍

1. Overload and alert fatigue

Clinical teams are already overwhelmed with EHR alerts, compliance alerts, and operational notifications. Queries often show up as one more inbox message and get buried among dozens of tasks competing for their limited attention.

‍

2. Timing disconnect and pressure

Many provider queries are sent days or weeks after the encounter. The provider, by that time, has moved on, and reconstructing their clinical reasoning feels like significant rework. Add to this the reality of daily patient care demands: 80% of clinicians cite insufficient time to respond to queries.

‍

3. Workflow friction

If responding to a query requires multiple clicks, toggling between systems, or leaving the clinical workflow, response rates decline. 47% of clinicians admit forgetting to follow up amid a busy workflow. 

‍

4. Perception and culture

In some organizations, providers still view CDI as a revenue protection function rather than a care quality initiative. When documentation is framed as administrative rather than clinical, it becomes easier to ignore.

‍

5. Query quality

High volume does not equal high value. Overwhelming providers with marginal or repetitive queries erodes trust. Over time, providers begin to tune them out, treating all queries, valuable or not, as noise. In fact, 25% of clinicians cite “low relevance” as a reason for not answering queries.

‍

6. Lack of accountability

The deeper concern isn't just unanswered queries, but the absence of consequences.  A 2024 ACDIS survey highlighted this clearly: 87.5% of organizations with high response rates had formal escalation policies in place. Without such measures, query silence is tolerated, and non-response quickly becomes the norm.

Taken together, these factors tell us why almost two-thirds of queries go unaddressed.  It is not always unwillingness, but also poorly aligned systems, culture, and accountability.

‍

The Cost of Low Query Response

Leaving queries unresolved has consequences that ripple far beyond medical coding accuracy:

• Revenue leakage: Missed HCC/HHS and secondary diagnoses mean risk scores and DRGs are underreported, directly lowering reimbursement.

• Audit vulnerability: Unresolved documentation gaps invite denials and weaken defense against payer audits.

• Data integrity risks: Patient records don't fully reflect acuity, skewing quality reporting and population health analytics.

• Team morale: CDI professionals spend hours designing queries that don’t translate into impact, resulting in burnout and disengagement.

‍

It’s not just a workflow snag. Every unanswered query drains provider engagement and erodes faith in the CDI program.

‍

How High-Performing Programs Break the Cycle

Leading CDI programs do not solve the query crisis by simply sending additional reminders. They redesign how queries are created, presented, and followed up on so that responses become an integral part of the clinical workflow.

Some such measures are listed below:
‍

1. Embed queries into existing workflows

The more queries are positioned near the point of care, the higher the response rates. HOM delivers prospective (pre-visit) CDI prompts and concurrent alerts within existing workflows, helping providers act in real time, reducing delays and minimising the need for retrospective clarification.

‍

2. Prioritize high-value queries with AI

Rather than sending a lot of trivial clarifications, prioritize 3-5 queries that clearly influence risk adjustment, quality scores, or compliance. Fewer but more significant queries increase provider trust.

‍

3. Create provider champions

Peer influence matters. HOM works with organizations to develop specialty-level provider champions, improving engagement as queries get reframed as mechanisms for clinical accuracy rather than billing tasks.  

‍

4. Implement transparent accountability

Publishing response rates, turnaround times, etc., creates visibility that drives accountability. With provider feedback dashboards, performance metrics are tracked by provider, making non-response harder to ignore and compliance easier to sustain.

‍

5. Align queries with care quality, not just revenue

Providers are more likely to respond when documentation is connected with patient safety, outcome reporting, or quality programs like HEDIS or Stars. Putting CDI in these terms makes queries feel central to care.

‍

How Technology Can Reset the Query Cycle

The right technology, when applied in the right way, can transform query responses from inbox fatigue into actionable nudges. Here’s how:

• Natural Language Processing (NLP) can scan thousands of charts to identify the most critical documentation gaps, helping CDI teams prioritize which queries to issue.

• EHR-embedded alerts surface queries directly in the provider’s workflow, instead of expecting them to dig through inboxes or separate systems.

• Mobile-friendly platforms enable doctors to answer queries promptly, even remotely, decreasing friction.

• Closed-loop systems track when queries are opened, seen, and resolved, creating accountability at every step.

• Gamification and recognition features reward high response rates, transforming query completion into an accomplishment, not an annoyance.

‍

The objective is not to introduce more alerts, but to develop smarter, better-timed nudges that are synchronized with clinical workflows.

‍

Final Takeaway

Unanswered queries aren’t only an administrative nuisance—they represent lost revenue, higher audit risk, and a barrier to provider engagement. Accepting 40%–60% response rates as “normal” is no longer sustainable.

‍

The organizations that win in 2025–2026 will be those that:

• Redefine queries as patient care, not just compliance
• Embed CDI into clinical workflows seamlessly
• Use technology to prioritize and simplify—not overwhelm
• Build cultures of accountability where unanswered queries are the exception, not the rule

‍

At HOM, we help providers, health systems, and payers put these principles into practice. 

‍

By redesigning clinical workflows, balancing smart automation with human engagement, our clients have achieved 98% coding accuracy, improved RAF scores by up to 40% and reduced chart review turnaround to just 24 hours, while steadily lifting query response rates.

Get a free CDI assessment from HOM to identify where your queries are getting stuck and for a customized roadmap for improvement.